top of page
Frequently Asked Questions
Paradigm Shift is developing financial infrastructure for museums and cultural institutions. Our model allows museums to build long-term sustainability utilizing an alternative method called reaccessioning (the decoupling of an objects financial claim, from that of the title and object). the rights are then consigned to a bankruptcy remote SPV, issued by, and overseen by Paradigm Shift. Through the SPV, the rights are then fractionalized and sold on the Paradigm Shift Marketplace.
We're in pre-seed development, actively refining our model with museum partners and advisors. We're transparent about being in the building phase - we believe the best solutions emerge from collaboration, not finished products.
Rayme Silverberg founded Paradigm Shift after witnessing the financial fragility of museums firsthand during her work in the nonprofit arts sector. The model emerged from rigorous research through NYU and has been shaped by conversations with museum professionals, legal experts, and financial advisors across North America.
Reaccessioning is a third approach to collection stewardship—distinct from accession and deaccessioning. It allows museums to create sustainable funding while retaining 100% ownership, custody, and curatorial authority. Nothing is sold or removed from the collection.
Deaccessioning removes objects from the collection, often through sale. Reaccessioning keeps objects in the collection while creating a financial structure that supports long-term institutional sustainability. Museums retain full ownership and control.
Yes. The model is structured under federal securities regulations and has been developed with input from museum legal counsel, securities attorneys, and cultural sector legal experts.
No. We've consulted museum ethics experts to ensure alignment with AAM guidelines. Because museums retain ownership, custody, and curatorial control—and because nothing is deaccessioned or sold—this approach doesn't violate ethical standards around collection stewardship.
Everything. Museums retain:
• 100% title and ownership
• Physical custody (art stays in the museum)
• All curatorial decisions
• Full public access
• Deaccessioning rights if circumstances change
• Complete institutional independence
Capital functions as a restricted micro-endowment: principal is preserved, and only investment returns are available for defined institutional priorities over time. This ensures long-term sustainability rather than short-term spending.
You retain full deaccessioning authority. The structure includes provisions for this scenario.
The museum does. Always. Curatorial authority never leaves the institution.
We're working with museums that have established collections, face genuine financial challenges, possess governance capacity to evaluate innovative approaches, and are willing to collaborate on refinement. This is a partnership, not a transaction.
It begins with a conversation to learn about your institution, followed by an information packet for your review. You decide if it warrants deeper exploration—there's no obligation at any stage. [Learn more →]
Paradigm Shift does not offer securities to the general public. Investment opportunities are available only to accredited institutional investors through private placement, in compliance with federal securities laws. For qualified parties, please contact us directly for private discussion.
We're seeking mission-aligned institutional investors who share our commitment to cultural sustainability, long-term thinking, transparency, and respect for museum sovereignty.
Detailed financial structures are available to qualified parties through private channels only. Generally, the model creates compliant vehicles that support museum sustainability while providing clear governance and reporting mechanisms.
Our approach emerged from a 20-month research effort in partnership with NYU, including interviews and working sessions with 32+ museum professionals, legal experts, financial advisors, and cultural sector thought leaders. [Download our full report →]
Through extensive consultation with museum directors, CFOs, board members, legal counsel specializing in cultural institutions, securities attorneys, financial advisors, and museum ethics experts.
Yes. We're in active development with museum partners who are helping us refine the approach. We're seeking additional partners willing to collaborate on pilot programs.
The model is structured under SEC regulations and federal securities laws. We work with legal counsel specializing in both cultural institutions and securities compliance.
Clear governance structures, transparent reporting mechanisms, and accountability to both participating museums and institutional partners.
Museum sovereignty is foundational to the model. All structures preserve museum authority, ownership, and mission. Legal agreements are reviewed by museum counsel before any partnership proceeds.
Schedule a Museum Discovery Session or request an information packet. [Start here →]
We welcome input from museum professionals, legal and financial experts, and cultural sector leaders. [Get in touch →]
Join our mailing list for monthly Field Notes with research insights, sector perspectives, and progress updates. [Subscribe →]
Contact us directly →
bottom of page